Terrorism

   The word terrorism when used as a judgement instead of a description, is an attempt to reframe reality to suit the people who use it, its a form of delusional sophistry.
   The act of terrorism is simply violence with the intention of breaking the enemies will to fight just like any other act of warfare. Regardless of sentiment it is clearly efficient so how is it wrong? Its unpleasant, its supposed to be but that has no bearing on its correctness. Terrorism is a weapon, when we object to terrorism it should not be because of what it is but because the enemy is using it more effectively than us.
   If we fall into the trap of objecting to terrorism on 'universal justice' grounds or because of timid domesticated 'morality' then we become absurd hypocrites, simultaneously condemning our enemies actions while having to justify our own disturbingly similar behaviour. If we try in spite of reality to fight somehow pleasantly, (as if that were even possible) we abandon hard reality in favour of sentiment, this is inexcusable and a betrayal of our people.
   Natural law, reality itself is uncompromising and ruthless how can we place our feelings above that? How can we pretend that reality is other than it is? There is no nice way to kill anything, and when a people fight for their existence to try and do so is pathetic and doomed. This doesn't mean that we always have to be sadistic but we must be honest and approach the needs of our people with pragmatism. How do we secure the existence of our people and a future for white children?
   In the end terrorism is a method.